<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Social Scientists Talk Evolutionary Psychology [Infografic]	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://evolvify.com/social-scientists-talk-evolutionary-psychology-infografic/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://evolvify.com/social-scientists-talk-evolutionary-psychology-infografic</link>
	<description>evolutionary theory and hunter-gatherer anthropology applied to the human animal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 20:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dame Liberty		</title>
		<link>https://evolvify.com/social-scientists-talk-evolutionary-psychology-infografic#comment-216</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dame Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 20:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvify.com/?p=1949#comment-216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Having been a French Literature major at an Ivy League relativist-pinko-factory, I spent 10 years of my post-university life as culture&#039;s bitch before my brain righted itself (with a little help from the Cosmides &#038; Toobey).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been a French Literature major at an Ivy League relativist-pinko-factory, I spent 10 years of my post-university life as culture&#8217;s bitch before my brain righted itself (with a little help from the Cosmides &amp; Toobey).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jenna		</title>
		<link>https://evolvify.com/social-scientists-talk-evolutionary-psychology-infografic#comment-215</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvify.com/?p=1949#comment-215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[youtube LRzTfxasB_w&#038;feature=player_embedded#! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRzTfxasB_w&#038;feature=player_embedded#! youtube]

Agghhh, ouch, the &#039;truth&#039; hurts. I feel so angry, having paid thousands for a completely worthless degree for the second time! It all began with liberal minded parenting, and the virtues of &#039;humanitarianism&#039; (what is that?). First degree began with Art, quit that, now, just quit Anthropology degree having figured, HYPOCRISY on a grand and implicit nonsensical scale. Trouble is my parents don&#039;t understand why, anthropology sucks ethically, dare I say it, theoretically! &#034;But you&#039;re being taught at a &#039;top London University!&#034; So my parents find it  easier to consider my, wrong doings. After all, &#034;your sis studied Anthropology, and is setting up an NGO in Africa! And her PHD thesis will be kept in the British Museum!!!!!&#034; I can&#039;t discuss my views with my sister unfortunately, because when I did try, certain points of view were unwittingly implicated, which proved a bit insulting.

So I used up most of my student loan on domains I didn&#039;t truly understand until I began to study them and proclaimed arrogant by &#039;the experts&#039; grading my essays. Arrogant, for providing contrary studies &#039;outside the domain of importance and empiricism! (haha (choke (splutter)&#039;. Seriously though, what the f**k do I do now! Should I become a builder? A plumber? Go back to school, and take all the subjects that my parents leanings taught me whilst a youngster, were no good, like Science? I am quite an intelligent person, but it has taken a little while to realize that, when ones &#039;peers&#039; and family members don&#039;t see things quite the same way.

Perhaps now, I sound arrogant. I was excluded by my teachers, given grades which did not reflect the value implicit in my research and arguments on theoretical grounds. For instance being told for most essays that my arguments weren&#039;t valid because I did not use &#039;ethnographic&#039; research, alone, to back them up, but psychological/cognitive studies, and philosophical arguments&#039; too. My work was deemed too abstract for validity. Funnily enough the only &#039;outstanding&#039; grade I was given was for Ethnographic film. I used exactly the same &#039;open minded research &#039;method&#039; as for social anthropology with quite different results. I think the only reason I obtained a high grade for ethnographic film was because as a domain it is having to legitimize its approach and methodology in obtaining valuable ethnographic data in relation to written ethnography (written ethnography is considered more &#039;scientific&#039;). And the only way really to prove films validity to social anthropologists is by showing how the same problems of representation and &#039;Semiotics&#039; is implicated for written ethnographic studies: which is what I chose to write about. Anyway, I think your site is brilliant. I just wish even more now, I hadn&#039;t been so impulsive and stupid to jump into another useless degree where your taught everything that prevents learning how to think, and even to live well. ARGGGG.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[youtube LRzTfxasB_w&amp;feature=player_embedded#! <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRzTfxasB_w&#038;feature=player_embedded#" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRzTfxasB_w&#038;feature=player_embedded#</a>! youtube]</p>
<p>Agghhh, ouch, the &#039;truth&#039; hurts. I feel so angry, having paid thousands for a completely worthless degree for the second time! It all began with liberal minded parenting, and the virtues of &#039;humanitarianism&#039; (what is that?). First degree began with Art, quit that, now, just quit Anthropology degree having figured, HYPOCRISY on a grand and implicit nonsensical scale. Trouble is my parents don&#039;t understand why, anthropology sucks ethically, dare I say it, theoretically! &quot;But you&#039;re being taught at a &#039;top London University!&quot; So my parents find it  easier to consider my, wrong doings. After all, &quot;your sis studied Anthropology, and is setting up an NGO in Africa! And her PHD thesis will be kept in the British Museum!!!!!&quot; I can&#039;t discuss my views with my sister unfortunately, because when I did try, certain points of view were unwittingly implicated, which proved a bit insulting.</p>
<p>So I used up most of my student loan on domains I didn&#039;t truly understand until I began to study them and proclaimed arrogant by &#039;the experts&#039; grading my essays. Arrogant, for providing contrary studies &#039;outside the domain of importance and empiricism! (haha (choke (splutter)&#039;. Seriously though, what the f**k do I do now! Should I become a builder? A plumber? Go back to school, and take all the subjects that my parents leanings taught me whilst a youngster, were no good, like Science? I am quite an intelligent person, but it has taken a little while to realize that, when ones &#039;peers&#039; and family members don&#039;t see things quite the same way.</p>
<p>Perhaps now, I sound arrogant. I was excluded by my teachers, given grades which did not reflect the value implicit in my research and arguments on theoretical grounds. For instance being told for most essays that my arguments weren&#039;t valid because I did not use &#039;ethnographic&#039; research, alone, to back them up, but psychological/cognitive studies, and philosophical arguments&#039; too. My work was deemed too abstract for validity. Funnily enough the only &#039;outstanding&#039; grade I was given was for Ethnographic film. I used exactly the same &#039;open minded research &#039;method&#039; as for social anthropology with quite different results. I think the only reason I obtained a high grade for ethnographic film was because as a domain it is having to legitimize its approach and methodology in obtaining valuable ethnographic data in relation to written ethnography (written ethnography is considered more &#039;scientific&#039;). And the only way really to prove films validity to social anthropologists is by showing how the same problems of representation and &#039;Semiotics&#039; is implicated for written ethnographic studies: which is what I chose to write about. Anyway, I think your site is brilliant. I just wish even more now, I hadn&#039;t been so impulsive and stupid to jump into another useless degree where your taught everything that prevents learning how to think, and even to live well. ARGGGG.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Csonka		</title>
		<link>https://evolvify.com/social-scientists-talk-evolutionary-psychology-infografic#comment-213</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Csonka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvify.com/?p=1949#comment-213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Our human ancestors ate meat?! Poppycock! ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our human ancestors ate meat?! Poppycock! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
